etf overlap tool · little overlap
QQQM vs VB overlap
0.4% of QQQM and VB is the same money, spread over 1 companies both funds hold.
Holdings as of September 30, 2026 · source: Invesco (QQQM), Vanguard (VB) · How we measured all 1,431 pairs
- same money
- same companies, extra weight
- only in this fund
The companies you would own twice
What only one of them gives you
AMZNAmazon.com Inc4.26%Where each fund puts its money
QQQM and VB: what people ask
How much do QQQM and VB overlap?
0.4% by weight, as of September 30, 2026: little overlap. 1 companies appear in both funds; they make up 0.4% of QQQM and 0.4% of VB.
Which stocks do QQQM and VB both hold?
The largest shared positions are MRNA. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.
Is it redundant to hold both QQQM and VB?
Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $0 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 101 names only in QQQM, 1,300 only in VB. Half in each behaves like 120 equally weighted stocks, against 32 for QQQM alone and 674 for VB alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.
How is ETF overlap calculated here?
For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files Invesco and Vanguard publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.
Weights come from each issuer's published holdings file and are matched company by company on their ISIN. Cash, futures and currency positions are left out. This page describes what the funds hold; it is not investment advice.