etf overlap tool · light overlap
IWM vs IJH overlap
12% of IWM and IJH is the same money, spread over 78 companies both funds hold.
Holdings as of October 16, 2026 · source: iShares (IWM), iShares (IJH) · How we measured all 1,431 pairs
- same money
- same companies, extra weight
- only in this fund
What only one of them gives you
Where each fund puts its money
IWM and IJH: what people ask
How much do IWM and IJH overlap?
12% by weight, as of October 16, 2026: light overlap. 78 companies appear in both funds; they make up 14% of IWM and 12% of IJH.
Which stocks do IWM and IJH both hold?
The largest shared positions are MOG-A, BTSG, UMBF, EAT and CTRE. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.
Is it redundant to hold both IWM and IJH?
Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $12 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 1,893 names only in IWM, 322 only in IJH. Half in each behaves like 796 equally weighted stocks, against 834 for IWM alone and 302 for IJH alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.
How is ETF overlap calculated here?
For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files iShares publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.
Weights come from each issuer's published holdings file and are matched company by company on their ISIN. Cash, futures and currency positions are left out. This page describes what the funds hold; it is not investment advice.