EEM vs EIMI overlap

Nearly: 86% of the money in EEM and EIMI sits in the same companies at the same weights, as of October 16, 2026. The other 14% is weight differences, plus 1 name only in EEM and 1,721 only in EIMI.

86% by weight, as of October 16, 2026: nearly the same fund. 1,168 companies appear in both funds; they make up 99.8% of EEM and 86% of EIMI.

The largest shared positions are 2330, 005930, 000660, 700 and 9988. Ranked by the smaller of the two weights, which is the part you would own twice.

Out of every $100 split evenly between them, about $86 (half in each fund) buys identical positions. The rest is exposure only one of the two funds gives you: 1 names only in EEM, 1,721 only in EIMI. Half in each behaves like 33 equally weighted stocks, against 29 for EEM alone and 38 for EIMI alone. Whether that duplication is a problem depends on the mix you want; this is a description, not advice.

Partly: 86% of the money in EIMI and EEM is the same, as of October 16, 2026. EIMI is iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (ISIN IE00BKM4GZ66), an Irish-domiciled UCITS fund on the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI index. European brokers generally don't sell US-listed ETFs such as EEM to retail clients, because those funds publish no KID (the PRIIPs key information document); UCITS funds do.

Yes. EIMI also trades as EMIM (London, GBP; Euronext Amsterdam, EUR) and IS3N (Xetra, EUR). Each is the same portfolio in another currency, on another exchange or paying its dividends out, so EEM vs IS3N also overlaps 86%.

For every company held by both funds we take the smaller of its two weights and add them up. The weights come from the full holdings files iShares publish, not a top-10 sample, and companies are matched by their ISIN so share classes stay apart. Sector overlap applies the same rule to the issuers' sector labels; "behaves like N equally weighted stocks" is one over the sum of the squared weights.